← Back to the Police Accountability Tracker
NEA REPORT POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY TRACKER

Jeremy Wheelis

READER-VOTE APPLE
Not enough votes yet to determine.
1 Documented Record • 1 Agency • 1 County
Relationship concerns documented January 2026; complaint received June 29; paid leave July 13; interviews July 22 and 28; dishonesty sustained and employment terminated Aug. 5; decertification requested Aug. 6; CLEST hearing vote October 2026.
Sustained
Agency: Jonesboro Police Department
County: Craighead
Record Type:
Decertification Dishonesty Internal Affairs Investigation Sustained Complaint Termination
Location: Jonesboro, Craighead County, Arkansas — Jonesboro Police Department

What Happened

JPD internal investigation PS 26-034 sustained a dishonesty finding against Cpl. Jeremy Wheelis concerning his relationship with a woman he described as an informant and whose cases he handled. A confidential informant reported allegations June 29, 2026, including a romantic relationship, database checks, sharing departmental information and a search-warrant warning. Investigators recovered 3,097 messages and seven voicemails from the woman’s phone under a probation search waiver. Capt. Scott Baker described explicit messages discussing past sexual encounters and photographs appearing to show Wheelis shirtless in bed with the woman. Wheelis repeatedly denied sexual contact, described the interaction as flirtatious and initially questioned whether he took the photographs before recalling taking one and saying he must have taken another. Baker concluded the communications showed at least a romantic phone relationship and probably a physical sexual relationship. The records also describe two active cases in which the woman was a victim and Wheelis was the assigned detective. Her identity is omitted here.

Agency Response

Relationship concerns had surfaced in January 2026; Wheelis was removed from a connected homicide investigation and ultimately reassigned from investigations to patrol. Lt. Morshaydrick Racy documented concerns that the undisclosed relationship jeopardized that case and could affect Wheelis’ testimony. The records do not establish that the homicide case was dismissed. Wheelis was placed on paid leave July 13 and interviewed July 22 and 28. Investigators consulted ACIC and found the database misuse allegation unfounded; Wheelis said he checked for warrants to arrange service or encourage surrender. The alleged search-warrant tip was not established, and Baker wrote that he believed Wheelis’ denial. Wheelis acknowledged showing the woman retail theft GroupMe photographs but said he was trying to identify suspects; investigators reported this led to another woman being alerted about Ulta theft footage. He denied funding incarcerated individuals’ accounts but acknowledged sending the woman money through Cash App. He declined a polygraph on his attorney’s advice and questioned its reliability; Baker cited the refusal as failure to cooperate.

Final Outcome

Chief Rick Elliott terminated Wheelis’ employment Aug. 5, 2026, after the dishonesty finding was sustained. The criminal/database misuse allegation was marked unfounded. The disciplinary notice cites ethics, conduct and investigations policy violations. JPD requested decertification Aug. 6; CLEST voted in October to proceed to a hearing, not to revoke certification. CLEST’s narrative incorrectly lists July 13 as the firing date; JPD’s leave notice, investigative notes and disciplinary notice establish July 13 as paid leave and Aug. 5 as termination. No criminal conviction or final decertification is established by these records.

Sources: NEA Report received JPD’s redacted 38-page PS 26-034 file from Sally Smith on Friday afternoon, Oct. 23, 2026, and separately obtained the 23-page CLEST referral packet from the Arkansas Department of Public Safety through FOIA. Wheelis sought an attorney general’s opinion in an effort to block release; the redacted file was subsequently provided. The primary source link opens the JPD file. Read the CLEST referral packet. Reviewed Oct. 23, 2026.
Last verified: Oct. 23, 2026
READER ENGAGEMENT

Public Vote

After reviewing the documented record, do you believe this officer belongs in the Police Accountability Tracker?

This is an unscientific reader poll, not a factual finding. The apple shows the percentage of Yes votes out of all responses, including Unsure. At least 10 votes are required.

HELP US KEEP THIS RECORD COMPLETE

Have Information About This Officer?

If you have public records, court documents, disciplinary records, video, photographs or other documentation relevant to this officer, NEA Report wants to review it.

We also want to hear about corrections, dismissed allegations, overturned findings or other information that may change or add context to this record.

Submit Information to NEA Report
Please include supporting documentation whenever possible.

Discover more from NEA Report

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.